Dave Pigott
2018-04-10 15:45:52 UTC
Hi all,
Early last week we transitioned all but one of the LKFT HiKeys to the new hikey-r2 device type, which essentially means we upgraded the firmware to build 55 and switched the device type support.
We left one as a hikey-r1 device type, just to catch any stray submissions. It had now been 6 days since any job was submitted to this device type, so Iâm asking if anyone knows any reason why we shouldnât migrate this last device to hikey-r2 device support?
If I donât hear any objections in the next 24 hours Iâll assume it is okay to migrate it.
Thanks
Dave
----------------
Dave Pigott
LAVA Lab Lead
Linaro Ltd
t: (+44) (0) 1223 400063
Early last week we transitioned all but one of the LKFT HiKeys to the new hikey-r2 device type, which essentially means we upgraded the firmware to build 55 and switched the device type support.
We left one as a hikey-r1 device type, just to catch any stray submissions. It had now been 6 days since any job was submitted to this device type, so Iâm asking if anyone knows any reason why we shouldnât migrate this last device to hikey-r2 device support?
If I donât hear any objections in the next 24 hours Iâll assume it is okay to migrate it.
Thanks
Dave
----------------
Dave Pigott
LAVA Lab Lead
Linaro Ltd
t: (+44) (0) 1223 400063